Animal Rights

Religious Discrimination and the Killing of Egypt's Pigs (Part 2)

Published June 24, 2009 @ 06:47AM PT

Please see part 1 of Kelly's exploration of this topic, "Egypt's Pigs: Beaten, Stoned, and Burned Alive (Part 1)", as well. -S. Ernst

Egypt is predominantly Muslim, with an estimated 85-90% of Egyptians practicing Islam. In contrast, about 9% of the country's population is comprised of Coptic Christians. In nations with such a power imbalance - where new legislation must conform to the religious majority's personal beliefs - those who belong to minority faiths are particularly vulnerable to discrimination.

Indeed, as the consumption of "pork" is prohibited by Islamic religious doctrine (and pigs are reviled as dirty and foul animals*), virtually all of Egypt's pig farmers are Coptic Christians. As we saw in Part 1, raising pigs for human consumption is their livelihood.

Obviously, a mass of animals, crammed into deficient housing and subsisting on garbage, constitutes a public health risk in and of itself. The Egyptian government's stated "public health" reasons might seem plausible, had they not initially cited "swine flu" as the overriding concern. Authorities promise that the "culls" aren't the end of pig farming, but rather a new beginning: with the nation's existing pig population gone, the government can relocate the farming operations to larger, less urban areas. Even so, Egypt's Coptic Christians remain skeptical - and with good reason.

Take, for example, the irrational and disproportionate treatment they (or their pigs, rather) received after the "culls" were announced:

Despite the fact that there have been no swine flu cases in Egypt, the general public is in a panic over the virus. On May 6, the popular TV talk show El-Beit Beitak aired a video of locals in the Abu Rawash district near Haram hurling stones at pigs and trying to run them over with their vehicles. Reportedly, the residents became alarmed after seeing some live and dead pigs on the road, believed to have fallen off trucks while being transported, and rumors quickly spread that the animals were infected with the virus.

While an exhaustive discussion of religious discrimination in Egypt is beyond the scope of this post, Amnesty International and the U.S. State Department have more. Suffice to say, Egypt's record on human rights - including those of religious minorities - is spotty at best.

Certainly, the driving force behind Egypt's pig "culls" is speciesism; if not for speciesism, Egyptian pigs would not be raised for food and forced to reside in urban slums - quite literally "on the bottom of the shitpile" - let alone become the target of cruel and needless "culls."

That said, religious discrimination directed at Coptic Christians by the country's Muslim majority may very well be adding to the pigs' suffering. Though the slaughter of animals for food is never a "humane" act (at best, it's a matter of survival), being tossed alive into a pit with hundreds of one's friends and relatives, doused in chemicals and set on fire seems an especially horrific way to go.

Aside from the mass killings, religious discrimination may also be a factor in the pigs' pitiable living conditions. Far from grazing in an idyllic pastoral setting, the pigs reside in houses (!) and subsist on waste - the only feed their poverty-stricken "owners" can afford. As the majority of Egypt's population is not Coptic Christian and does not consume pork - abhors it, in fact - the government has little impetus to improve the farmers' (and pigs') living conditions.

In this case, both the pigs and their "owners" are the victims of religious discrimination (a cruel irony, as pigs have no religion); the pigs' suffering, however, is compounded further by speciesism.

Likewise, the pigs' situation is unique in that they fall victim to two forms of religious discrimination. On one level, pigs as a species are discriminated against: pigs are viewed as unclean, foul animals. While this might seem to be a net positive - inasmuch as such beliefs prohibit the consumption of pigs - pigs are hardly afforded any special protections, either (as is illustrated by the pig culls). Oddly, pigs are also persecuted as the "property" of a religious minority. However, unlike other forms of property that may be damaged, pigs are sentient: they can think, feel and suffer.

This story also demonstrates how one can be at once a victim and an oppressor: in their relationship with the country's Muslim majority, Coptic Christians are a marginalized group; but in relation to non-human animals, they are free to dominate and exploit at will.

Looking towards the future, the simplest thing you can do to help prevent similar "culls" is go vegan. Intensive factory farming is the driving force behind animal-borne pathogens, whether H5N1 (bird flu) or H1N1 (swine flu).

Of course, a little religious tolerance and secularism go a long way, too!

* I should note that, as with all of the world's holy books, the Koran is open to interpretation. I don't mean to suggest that all Muslims subscribe to this belief.

-----
Photo: AP/Nasser Nouri

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (11)

  1. Carrie Lachapelle

    Sometimes I lose hope that we will somehow overcome our horrendous behavior toward living animals and become better than what and who we are. Hope, is the reason I am here but stories like this reaffirm how far we have to go.

    Posted by Carrie Lachapelle on 06/24/2009 @ 08:56AM PT

  2. Jeannie -

    Excellent and informative post, Kelly. Thank you for pointing out the intersection of oppression happening between the pigs and the religious minority in Egypt - no one else is doing so.

    Quote from the article: "Now, they say, the cull is not a measure against swine flu but is intended more generally to improve public health."

    This reminds me of the US government's successive reasons (lies) for invading Iraq and killing thousands of innocent people there (first it was because Iraq had WMD, then it was because Saddam was in cahoots with Al Qaeda, and the final strained reason was that we were "helping" the people of Iraq). When someone wants a real motive to remain secret, the successive lies generated to keep the real agenda under wraps tend to morph and evolve through time.

    The Egyptian government is also using another tactic that is familiar to the US government - taking advantage of a situation to create a panic in the country so they can carry out their own selfish vile agenda. The Egyptian people are in a state of unnecessary fear and paranoia of catching the swine flu. In a quote from the article you linked, an interviewee says, "Muslims do not want to deal with my neighbor who sells electronic appliances as his shop is right next to a man who deals with pigs, [and they are afraid] that he might infect them with swine flu." Liken this to Level Orange hysteria and 911 racial profiling in the US. Only in Egypt, they're using alarmist propaganda and shock to conveniently further their own previous personal agenda. What's ensued is the racial profiling of pigs and Coptic Christians. The violations of human rights and nonhuman animal rights oftentimes go hand in hand.

    I agree with what many animal rightists are saying about it - that what's happening to the pigs in Egypt isn't necessarily any different than what is happening anywhere else: the slaughter of animals is taking place everywhere on this planet and by the billions, including right here on our own US turf.

    However, what is significant about this story is that it is a clear-cut example of how human oppression and animal oppression are linked. Just as violence breeds violence, oppression breeds oppression. Many vegans/animal rightists have commented on the atrocities happening to pigs in Egypt, but none that I have seen (except you) have commented on the interlinked crimes committed against both the pigs and the people who farm them.

    One can easily and simply say, "Who cares about the farmers - they are killing pigs for profit - they deserve no sympathy." But oppression, usually derived from another source of oppression, often fans out into various branches (sometimes like a trickle-down effect). In this case, there is simultaneous oppression of members of a religious minority, the underprivileged, the workers, the children...and pigs. Yes, the pigs are the most affected and that cannot be understated, but by ignoring the oppression happening to the people as well, is to ignore the elements that cause oppression itself (and stubbornly prevent the possibility of understanding and uncovering the origin/root of oppression). If the Coptic Christians in Egypt were treated equally, perhaps they would not have resorted to raising and slaughtering pigs for profit to begin with. And if the Coptic Christians were not disvalued, perhaps the pigs would not have reaped the horrifying consequences of the Muslim's hate. It is not an accident that a large portion of the religious minority lives in squalor...and that consequently the animals associated with them suffer the most.

    And there's more racism and hatred to throw into the mix. We can't leave out the Jews. A popular Muslim religious leader urged the slaughter of the pigs because he states that Jews are the source of pigs: http://albawaba.com/en/news/24548 .

    To each their own agenda, right?

    In Jordan, the Islamic Action Front (IAF) called for all the pig farms in the country to be closed: http://www.jordantimes.com/?news=17838 . And..."On Monday, the Balqa Health Department said it had installed thermal imaging detectors at the King Hussein Bridge to screen travellers coming from the Palestinian territories to ensure that they are free from swine flu..." Only the Palestinian territories, huh? The secretary general of IAF said, "Hotels and areas frequently visited by tourists should be put under constant surveillance to prevent the spread of the virus across the country." Hmm. I detect more intersections.  

    "Researchers" are now saying that the Swine Flue originated not in Mexico (Smithfield off the hook? - not surprising), but probably in Asia: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/health/24flu.html?_r=2&emc=eta1 . Nice to know, since that is where they culled/killed millions of birds to ward off the Avian Flu.

    Posted by Jeannie - on 06/24/2009 @ 03:08PM PT

  3. Kelly Garbato

    This reminds me of the US government's successive reasons (lies) for invading Iraq and killing thousands of innocent people there

    The Egyptian government is also using another tactic that is familiar to the US government - taking advantage of a situation to create a panic in the country so they can carry out their own selfish vile agenda. The Egyptian people are in a state of unnecessary fear and paranoia of catching the swine flu.

    That's an interesting point, Jeannie. I can definitely see the similarities. I wonder how the average Egyptian Muslim felt about Christian pig farmers before the swine flu panic -- i.e., is the government mostly responsible for the hysteria and resentment, or is it just taking advantage of resentment and prejudice that was already there (or a little bit of both)?

    Posted by Kelly Garbato on 06/24/2009 @ 04:19PM PT

  4. Reply to thread
  5. Jeannie -

    Oops - after rereading I just realized how long my post was...sorry! Sometimes I get going on a subject that I'm passionate about, and I just go on and on...  -- ye olde windbag.

    Posted by Jeannie - on 06/24/2009 @ 03:11PM PT

  6. Olivia White

    I'm glad you went on and on, Jeannie. I learned a lot from reading your insightful, cogent thoughts.

    Posted by Olivia White on 06/25/2009 @ 05:57PM PT

  7. Reply to thread
  8. Daniel Wilson

    Great article Kelly! For more on the link between human and animal oppression, may I suggest David Nibert's Animal Rights/Human Rights: Entanglements of Oppression and Liberation.  It's a very interesting and eye-opeining read. Cheers!

    Posted by Daniel Wilson on 06/25/2009 @ 05:57AM PT

  9. Kelly Garbato

    Yes, it's on my reading list! So many books, so little time :)

    Posted by Kelly Garbato on 06/25/2009 @ 02:41PM PT

  10. Jeannie -

    I highly recommend Nibert's book as well.

    Posted by Jeannie - on 06/26/2009 @ 09:59PM PT

  11. Reply to thread
  12. Lisa Smolen

    It's an important point of the article to say that the oppressed (Christians) are also the oppressors (of animals).  The cycle is so obvious.  Except instead of, as in the USA, the Christians as majority, they are minority.  A reversal of what we, as Americans, perceive to be the norm. 

    Perhaps an opportunity to view our "farming" practices through a different lens - see it for the aberration that it is.  Religion aside, CAFOs are not good for the land, the people, the animals, only good for business.

    Posted by Lisa Smolen on 06/25/2009 @ 07:56AM PT

  13. Teresa Weetman

    I am sickened by the cruelty our food animals undergo. I am trying to start an information website for my area in Vancouver B.C. Canada. This is for people who are not ready to be vegan but want to NOT be part of the cruelty that feed animals often suffer.

    I would like to list it here and would appreciate feedback

    www.ethicalmeat.ca

    Posted by Teresa Weetman on 08/20/2009 @ 06:01PM PT

  14. Samir Fahmy

    Dear Kelly,

    With all my respect, you know that this photo was taken through a world wide campaign against the spread of swine flu and by all States to take measures of protection not as you mentioned. Relegion has nothing to do with this issue, we are living in one world and we all keen to protect our selves.

    Posted by Samir Fahmy on 10/25/2009 @ 04:47AM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author
Kelly Garbato

A heathen vegan feminist living in rural Missouri with her husband and six furkids (five dogs and a cat), Kelly's interests include animal and human rights, pop culture, language, and the intersecting nature of oppressions. She loves good vegan eats and blaming the patriarchy; you can watch her do both (sometimes simultaneously!) at easyVegan.info.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.