Animal Rights

Order 12 Baby Chicks for Easter, Get 2 Dead Babies Free!

Published April 09, 2009 @ 03:28AM PT

Alternate title: "No Eggs for Easter Please"

The primary title isn't a joke. The exclamation-mark excitement is sarcastic, of course. But the offer, though not worded in such terms, is quite real (and truly, it's more of a 1:1 deal if you consider what happens before your order ships out in addition to what you actually see in the box). For a couple months now, I've been sitting on a list of links and a plan to at some point write about the hatcheries whose Web sites provide all the details you could want about ordering live chicks, whether for your large-scale egg farm or for your backyard. And with Easter egg excitement and baby chick mania upon us, this seems like the time to have this discussion.

We've talked about egg production cruelties on this blog, including the fact that egg-laying hens, whether they are exploited on factory farms or "free-range" farms, come from hatcheries, where 50 percent of the chicks who hatch are killed when one or two days old, in ways that are anything but humane--they are suffocated, crushed, ground up alive, or otherwise left to die slowly and in agony. They are killed because they are male. Male chicks won't grow up to lay eggs. And males of the egg-laying type don't grow fast and fat enough for the chicken flesh industry's liking. So 250 million male chicks per year (repeat that with me--250 million) in the United States are treated like trash as soon as their sex has been determined.

But the killing and treatment of chicks like throwaway commodities doesn't stop at the hatchery (where, for the record, male and female newborn chicks alike are handled roughly and inhumanely). The female chicks still have to get to their destination, dead or alive.

Shipping a bunch of day-old chicks as if they actually matter, as if they're actually sentient, fragile babies, would not be cost-effective. So even so-called humane egg producers and hobbyists receive their chicks the cheap and easy way--by USPS mail. Yes, I'm serious. Live baby animals are being stuffed into boxes and sent through the mail every single day, in all kinds of weather and conditions, treated like any other mailed package for the most part. Legally. For "humane" egg production.

But wouldn't chicks constantly be injured and killed if this were true? Yes, they would. And they are. But customers still get their money's worth because suppliers have a policy of sending their customers more chicks than the customers ordered, to make up for the inevitability of dead and/or injured chicks on arrival.

Just for fun, let's look at some of the language and guarantees from the suppliers themselves. Take note of phrases such as "live delivery of ordered amount" and "normal extra" and "good condition," like the chicks are just inanimate items from a catalog. Note also, of course, that no supplier is going to guarantee a 100% live shipment--only that you'll get at least as many live chicks as you ordered, plus some dead and/or dying ones (it's not uncommon for many of the chicks who survive the trip to still die within days after arrival).

We GUARANTEE 100% live delivery of ordered amount. We will replace free of charge, or will refund the full purchase price of any shipment or part thereof which is missing or not in good condition upon arrival.

We guarantee that you will receive full count of live, healthy poultry according to this guarantee. We place extra chicks in each box to help fulfill this guarantee. However, if losses should occur in shipment and you do receive less live chicks than you ordered, we will make an adjustment either by replacing poultry, or by cash refund at the discretion of the hatchery.

I live on the East Coast, will my chicks handle the shipping from California?
Yes. We include in every out of state shipment a special supplement for the chicks during shipment. This supplement has proven to allow the chicks to handle a 3 day shipment time with virtually no problems! However, if you do experience any loss above the normal extra that is included in every shipment, contact us immediately and we'll replace or refund your loss.

These tiny beings who've just barely come into the world--and who came into the world in harsh, artificial surroundings (with certainly no mother or mother figure to provide comfort or care)--are treated carelessly from the moment they first see the light outside their shells, and at one day old, the males are unceremoniously discarded, and the females are packed into shipping boxes to fill orders, like books or CDs, their lives worth nearly nothing to the businesses that ship them off fully expecting some of them to be killed by the traumatic transport. Their lives are miserable even from the very start.

Just as dairy is predicated on the killing of baby calves, egg production is predicated on the mass killing of baby male chicks and nonchalant endangerment and sometimes killing of female chicks too. So a holiday weekend that for many is a celebration of life maybe should be egg-free rather than egg-focused, eh?

---
Image of discarded male chicks courtesy of soylent-network, via all-creatures.org

Priority Mail chick image courtesy of The Animals Voice

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (6)

  1. Luella -

    And you see, no one cares, because everyone is caught up in this utilitarian argument of: their lives wouldn't be any better anyway. Let's just face the fact that most of us have very little if any respect for nonhuman life.

    Posted by Luella - on 04/09/2009 @ 09:01AM PT

  2. Alex Melonas

    I don't think this would be acceptable on a utilitarian premise Luella. The harm certainly outweighs the good. Therefore, even if prior existence is a problem, the suffering involved here belies the claim that we are doing the animals any good by bringing them into existence for this purpose.   

    Posted by Alex Melonas on 04/09/2009 @ 01:05PM PT

  3. Luella -

    Well, some wouldn't accept it as a utilitarian argument, but others would. For example, I've heard it argued again and again and again that caring for animals is futile because in the wild they'll just be ripped apart by predators or die of some horrible disease. Well, so would humans, in the wild, yet this is never an argument considered with regard to humans.

    Posted by Luella - on 04/11/2009 @ 08:06AM PT

  4. Jen Ruff

    I agree Luella that some would argue such. However, as you point out so well, these same proponents must necessarily extend this reasoning to members of our species. Ought we enslave the millions upon millions of the sick and impoverished human animals that currently populate our world? The end result could be such that these individuals will suffer less enslaved than they would out of enslavement: they would receive health care, water, food, and shelter. "Compassion" like that must extend.  

    Posted by Jen Ruff on 04/11/2009 @ 08:15AM PT

  5. Sheila Gredzinski

    I know too many who do have respect and care for life, human and animal, the problem isn't with those who care, it's with the governments who are being bought by the powerful and wealthy companies selling their suffering and death.

    ty Stephanie for your postings.

    Posted by Sheila Gredzinski on 08/08/2009 @ 09:20AM PT

  6. IshTar Kiem

    Were can I order some of the 12 chicks with the two free. I can always feed the two free to my cats. Thank you.

    IshTar Kiem

    ishtarkiem@yahoo.com

     

    Posted by IshTar Kiem on 09/07/2009 @ 02:33PM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author
Stephanie Ernst

Stephanie is an independent animal rights advocate, a vegan, a tree-hugging environmentalist, and a freelance editor and writer. She lives in St. Louis with an aging corgi-lab and an adolescent rescued pit bull.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.