Animal Rights

NIH-Funded Nicotine Testing on Animals

Published October 23, 2008 @ 06:02AM PT

Thimble, one of many victims of Spindel\'s nicotine tests at OHSUPerhaps you've noticed in the last few days that one of the actions currently featured in the sidebar is "Tell the NIH to Stop Testing Nicotine on Animals." For those of you who haven't read the summary there yet, I'll repeat my brief introduction to the action, sponsored by In Defense of Animals (IDA):

Researchers in the United States, with the help of millions of taxpayer dollars and the support of the federal government and National Institutes of Health (NIH), are still conducting cruel nicotine experiments on helpless animals—pregnant and newborn monkeys as well as rats and mice—even though the harmful effects of smoking are already well-known.

The first time I learned that the tobacco industry and federal government both are still funding nicotine and smoking experiments on animals (this campaign relates to just one area of such testing; there are more), I was stunned.

Many proponents of animal testing and medical research are fond of arguing that such testing and experiments are performed only when necessary—only when tests on animals are the supposedly best, most reliable option we have, only when the experiments' results could lead to significant human benefits, and only when the potential benefit to humans outweighs the harm to the nonhuman animals used in the tests.

What-the-hell-ever. IDA points out, "Animal experiments failed to demonstrate that exposure to cigarettes and tobacco smoke caused lung and other forms of cancer, which is now undisputed in humans." Yet conducting intensely cruel experiments on mother and newborn monkeys is our best, most reliable method of addressing the issue of smoking during pregnancy? How does the extreme harm to these monkeys not outweigh the potential benefit to humans when we already know that pregnant mothers should not smoke and when the ability of such experiments to predict results in humans has been disproven rather than proven?

For more details on what's happening to these monkeys and on what you can do to help, I direct you to the following pages, videos, and Web sites:

And finally, a (non-graphic) video on the OHSU research:

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (3)

  1. Alex Melonas

    'Nicotine addiction' scratches the surface: Animal exploitation for cocaine addiction tests happen on my campus, American University. 

    Posted by Alex Melonas on 10/24/2008 @ 09:40AM PT

  2. Reply to thread
  3. Stephanie Ernst

    God. I didn't know that.

    Posted by Stephanie Ernst on 10/24/2008 @ 10:46AM PT

  4. Terry Russo

    Elliot Spindel has been receiving National Institutes of Health- government grants to conduct his "experiments" since 1992. So far, he's received 7.6 million dollars of tax-payer money, and the experiments are expected to continue at least until 2012. Spindel is making a very good living by trying to find a "safe" way for pregnant women to continue smoking during their pregnancies. For decades, smoking has been known to cause lung cancer, and a host of serious diseases. Why is our government paying this guy to help pregnant women to smoke? Once their babies are born, the women who were encouraged to go on smoking, will be exposing their newborns to their cigaret smoke. It's outrageous that the government continues to pay for these experiments. There is no way that any intelligent person would think that this is legitimate, important research. All it is is an excuse to make this sadistic guy rich through the suffering of innocent, helpless animals. Why is the government condoning these ridiculous experiments, let alone paying so much for them? Why wasn't the money spent on helping pregnant women to quit smoking? The NIH seems like it answers to no one, especially not to American citizens, the taxpayers who are unwillingly finding the experiments.

    Posted by Terry Russo on 02/04/2009 @ 11:10AM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author
Stephanie Ernst

Stephanie is an independent animal rights advocate, a vegan, a tree-hugging environmentalist, and a freelance editor and writer. She lives in St. Louis with an aging corgi-lab and an adolescent rescued pit bull.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.