Killing Fishes for Fuel?
Published August 13, 2009 @ 01:53PM PT
As noted in the past, I have a love-hate relationship with TreeHugger when it comes to the site's animal-related coverage, and when I saw this headline this morning--"LiveFuels to Farm Fish to Make Biofuel = Bad Idea"--I initially groaned, not processing the "Bad Idea" part right away. But it turns out TreeHugger and I agree this time. Writer Matthew McDermott too thinks that the following is a preposterous and unethical proposal:
LiveFuels thinks it knows the way around making expensive algae biofuel production equipment and scaling that up for commercial production, raise fish to eat the algae and store it in their organs, and then kill the fish to get the oil.
Crazy, right? But when we get down to the fundamentals, I struggle to see how this differs from fattening animals to kill them and take their body parts and fluids unnecessarily for our dinner purposes (the writer indicates that he has a problem with factory farming but doesn't in this piece clearly indicate an aversion to the unnecessary fattening, killing, and taking-from in general). Nevertheless, I'm still glad that McDermott points out the ethical problem in this particular case, and I'll almost-ignore his brief remark regarding fishes' intelligence (which is actually much greater than most realize), given that he's still standing up for them:
Assuming LiveFuels works out the technical kinks, how many fish would we have to raise in ponds, deal with the waste from that, and then kill, just to power our cars, buses and airplanes? . . .
This whole thing just strikes me as grossly unethical, not to mention absurd.
Indeed. And it's easy to draw a comparison to the equal absurdity of killing animals to power our bodies, when we have alternatives in that arena as well.
Read McDermott's post in full here.
---
The photo of tilapia farming above is taken shamelessly from the TreeHugger post, which in turn published it courtesy of Flickr user Andy.
Share this Post
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
EmailRelated Posts
-
"Guilt-Free" Sushi Doesn't Include Bits of Fish
-
Three Reasons Not to Eat Fish
-
Cattle Culture, Aquaculture, and Export of the Western Diet
Comments (4)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Author
-
Stephanie is an independent animal rights advocate, a vegan, a tree-hugging environmentalist, and a freelance editor and writer. She lives in St. Louis with an aging corgi-lab and an adolescent rescued pit bull.
Man, this just makes me feel sick inside.
Posted by Andrew Werling on 08/13/2009 @ 07:08PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Just when I wonder, "What will they think of next?" something horrible like this happens. Aside from being ethically reprehensible, it sounds like the least-efficient way of generating fuel ever. Kind of like filtering grain through cows, then killing the cows....
Posted by Shannon Davis on 08/14/2009 @ 05:43AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
This is so weird. I guess I should be happy that my mind is too naive to come up with cruelties like this.
Posted by Lisa Smolen on 08/14/2009 @ 06:51AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Reminds me of hens in a battery cage. I would think the fish would not enjoy being squished or being unable to "flap" their fins or having fish feces from above rain down on them or inhaling the odors from such cramped conditions. My heart cries out for them to be FREE.
Posted by Olivia White on 08/15/2009 @ 12:04AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.