Animal Rights Bloggers Take On Temple Grandin
Published January 29, 2009 @ 05:00AM PT
Temple Grandin, famous for her work on slaughterhouse designs as well as her expertise in autism (she is autistic herself), has a new book out titled Animals Make Us Human: Creating the Best Life for Animals. Always a controversial figure in the animal rights crowd, she's even more a topic of conversation these days because of her most recent book, because of the gratingly uncritical reviews of that book, and because of the way people have been comforting themselves by insisting that because Grandin has designed certain slaughterhouses, animals killed at those slaughterhouses don't suffer and fear, and people don't need to feel guilty about eating them. Yet they do suffer and fear, even at Grandin's slaughterhouses, and we have no reason to stop feeling guilty.
I've been intending to post on this topic for the last week, but I've kept putting it off. And in the meantime, several other animal rights bloggers have stepped up and, combined, have articulated essentially my own positions. Following the jump are some selections from the smart, insightful, pointed, and--yes--sometimes a bit angry things they've had to say. The following are just excerpts from the bloggers' commentaries, so please follow the links to read the original posts in their entirety.
Animal Person
In this brief commentary Mary Martin first quotes the New York Times review that has irritated many:
Ms. Grandin has designed humane and stress-free slaughter systems that are used now to process about half of all the cattle in the United States and Canada. There is some cognitive dissonance here. She is often asked, she tells us, “How can you care about animals when you design slaughter plants?”
Her reply is that “some people think death is the most terrible thing that can happen to an animal.” She argues that “the most important thing for an animal is the quality of its life.”
And then Mary points out some of the problems she sees here:
First, to say that we have humane and stress-free slaughter systems is a complete contradiction in terms. I'm not sure when humane and stress-free were first introduced to and taken seriously as descriptors of slaughter, but this has got to stop.
And finally, though quality of "its" life is surely important to an animal, I'd wager that getting killed, no matter when, where or how, and being lied to for your entire existence, as you exist only for the benefit of someone else's palate, is important as well. There's simply no way around what Grandin has done: She has helped millions of Americans feel as if they're not causing harm by eating animals.
Digging Through the Dirt
Tracy cuts right to the chase in "Animal Lovers Don't Support Slaughter":
Grandin designs slaughterhouses and is a legend in the field. She's written a new book, "Animals Make Us Human: Creating the Best Life for Animals," which was reviewed yesterday in The New York Times. The title makes me shake my head in disbelief. If animals make us human, why do we kill them? What does "human" mean? How is raising animals and then murdering them for their flesh creating a good life for them?
Ms. Grandin bases many of her observations in "Animals Make Us Human" on the work of a Washington State University neuroscientist named Jaak Panksepp who identified a series of core "emotion systems" in animals: seeking, play, care and lust (on the positive side) and fear, panic and rage (on the negative).
This information should provide anyone with an impetus to go vegan. Animals are not inanimate objects. They are not unfeeling beings. They are like people in fundamental ways.
Yet Grandin doesn't use her talents to end the suffering and murder of animals. She's a mere welfarist who fluffs the pillow while someone else plunges the knife in. . . .
Despite what Grandin thinks, one can't have it both ways. One can't claim to like animals and then praise the forces that murder them.
The full post at Digging Through the Dirt includes more insightful commentary.
Veggie Going Vegan
"Temple Grandin does not get a free pass" from Elisa. Here's why:
Temple Grandin is famous for being autistic and using that condition as a jumping off point to a career in animal management. She is quite acclaimed . . . for her work on improving conditions for food animals.
I am not so ready to laud her. I tend to agree more with Mary Martin from Animal Person who says: "There's simply no way around what Grandin has done: She has helped millions of Americans feel as if they're not causing harm by eating animals."
I mostly hate the way people, even the NY Times reporter, take her story at such face value that they repeat, without question or concrete back-up, such statements as: "Ms. Grandin’s autism gives her a special understanding of what animals, whether house cats or cattle, think, feel and — perhaps most important — desire."
Really? Who. Says. So? Answer: She does.
She also consults for some of the companies that she praises in her books for taking humane measures. I think she gets a free pass on what we would call "shilling" [in anyone else's case]. . . . Temple Grandin makes her money from the very industry she is commenting on. I don't think that's irrelevant.
See the rest of the post here.
Reformed Fast Food Mascot
In his post "Temple Grandin Is Stealing Ronald McDonald's Thunder," David tackles this issue in a different way and like only the Reformed Fast Food Mascot can: with imaginative snark.
Classic advertising icon Ronald McDonald. Animal welfare advocate, slaughterhouse designer and McDonald's consultant Temple Grandin. If it weren't for the wig and face paint, we'd have a hard time telling them apart. They both both boost McDonald's sales and increase shareholder value. They both pimp McDonald's whenever a microphone's put in front of their face.
McDonald's should be given credit for bringing about improvements in animal welfare in the entire beef industry ... I have been in this business for more than 25 years, and I have never seen such a transformation. -- Temple Grandin
. . .
Ronald's been getting a little jealous of all the attention Temple Grandin's been getting lately. He's like the aging star quarterback when a hotshot rookie is drafted. All his years of loyalty and hard work and now on the responsible purchasing page of the McDonald's website there's a quotation from Temple Grandin praising McDonald's and even a picture of her inspecting cattle. But there's no picture of Ronald. . . . Sure, they're all smiles and pats on the back when they see Ronald at one of the commercial film shoots, but behind his back it's Temple Grandin this, Temple Grandin that. Temple Grandin is getting people to think we care about the animals we slaughter. Temple Grandin just praised us in her book on animal kindness. Temple Grandin, Temple Grandin. It's enough to make Ronald sick. He thought getting shit-faced last night with Mayor McCheese would get his mind off things, but it didn't help at all. This morning he woke up with a vicious hangover and Temple Grandin was still out there, going on interviews about her new book, talking about how McDonald's is doing so much for animals.
Full post here.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Wonderland Amusement Park Slaughter
-
Updates on Wolves, Whales, and Dolphins: The Hunts Go On
-
Inside the Humane Slaughterhouse
Comments (9)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















Thanks for the kind words, Stephanie. :)
Posted by Tracy Habenicht on 01/29/2009 @ 08:05AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
You might find Jim Sinclair (another autistic person with a more credible claim to the title of "activist")'s writing on this topic interesting: http://web.syr.edu/~jisincla/killing.htm
Posted by The Autistic Self-Advocacy Network on 01/29/2009 @ 10:07AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I wrote about some of Grandin's points in an newsletter we had in an organization I used to be with. I was showing that her view that nonhuman animals are like autistic humans wass actually false and that healthy nonhuman animals are not mentally handicapped in their cognition, just different.
I respect Grandin for what she's done with overcoming autism and finding solutions to things but I definitely do not agree with welfarist propaganda and "humane" slaughter. There is no "humane" slaughter. The terms are mutually exclusive, as your blog and others you linked to have already said.
Posted by Philosophia and Animal Liberation on 01/29/2009 @ 06:14PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Grandin claims that if she doesn't eat meat, she becomes hypoglycemic. I think that's nonsense -- if she has a problem with her glycemic index, she doesn't need to eat meat to correct it.
Average persons, like myself, see a number of reasons to disagree with Grandin's theory: nonhumans think humans with autism. Even scientists had been quick to accept it. But now there's hope beause Grandin's theory is being challenged by science. I think it would be better for nonhumans if Grandin's theory and assumptions are discredited.
http://www.plos.org/cms/node/327
Posted by Ellie Maldonado on 01/29/2009 @ 07:18PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Thanks for Sinclair's essay, "if you love something, you don't kill it". I liked the way he compared the skills of a hangman, to Grandin... Very well thought out conclusion. Am anxious to read more of his writings. :)
And Tracy... Kudos to the dead on accuracy: She's a mere welfarist who fluffs the pillow while someone else plunges the knife in. . . .
But, can there be anything creepier for a person who thinks in images to be designing slaughterhouses? You couldn't fabricate a stranger truth...
Posted by Bea Elliott on 01/29/2009 @ 08:41PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Ms. Grandin is as creepy as it gets. She's an animal killer, full stop.
Posted by Antonio Pasolini on 02/13/2009 @ 07:04AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Grandin reminds me of the Nazi's who designed the most efficient and least stressful ways to kill the Jews. They accomplished this by tricking them from understanding what was about to happen. They would tell them they were just going to take showers and then they poison gassed them so they end up in a big heaping pile of naked corpses...SURPRISE! same thing Grandin does. This just makes the killing EASIER on the killers. Nazis were all about efficiency, so is the slaughter industry. A clueless calm cow, clueless calm human is easier to kill. It's all very sick.
Posted by S I on 02/14/2009 @ 05:37PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Unfortunatley, people will eat meat whether there is a Temple Grandin or not. If she has prevented even a few animals from the fear of slaughter, it's better than anything I've done.
Posted by Janet Cerretani on 02/18/2009 @ 03:34PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I wasn't acquainted with Change.org in January, so I hadn't read this blog until now. When I clicked on the link to Jim Sinclair's essay, I came up empty. A quick Google of his name and "If you love something, you don't kill it" showed me several sites, among them this one:
http://animaladvocateswatchdog.com/cgi-bin/watchdog.pl/noframes/read/1776
Bea's right, it's very good.
I'm sure, by the way, that Jim meant to title it: "If you love someone, don't kill him -- or her"!
Posted by Olivia White on 10/02/2009 @ 12:29AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.