And On and On the Pit Bull Conversation Goes

Published April 11, 2009 @ 09:19AM PT

Nathan Winograd has this morning posted an additional thoughtful (and thought-provoking) response to the agreement between HSUS, Best Friends, and others announced yesterday, including some interesting details on how the agreement was come to that you won't find elsewhere. There are good reasons to still be only cautiously optimistic about what this agreement means or does not mean, and Winograd makes the case for that caution well. I'd much rather be celebrating a real, significant change that could, over time, save hundreds or thousands of pit bull lives, that will start changing public perception, and that shows that even the biggest, most powerful organizations can change course in meaningful ways even when that change is difficult or takes some pride-swallowing--I'd much rather be doing that than sitting around and dissecting what the agreement really means or what changes we can really hope for.

But the simple truth is that just hoping it means what so many of us want it to mean and celebrating the assumption that the vague, not-easily-reached agreement will mean major changes without real proof or assurances that it will might make us feel better, but it won't help the dogs. So the conversation continues. And we watch and wait and see what happens next--what further statements are made and, most importantly, what happens following the next inevitable busts of dog-fighting operations. Will the same patterns be followed? Will there be words about individual evaluations followed by, still, determinations that all, even nursing puppies, should be killed? Or will the change so many of us want to see really happen? We'll see.

Please do read Nathan Winograd's post here: Las Vegas Round 3. As I noted earlier, there are insights here, some disconcerting, that you won't find elsewhere about how the agreement was reached and what it took to get there and about what all this may or may not mean. It really is an excellent, thoughtful post.

Share this Post

Comments (1)

This is a great post. Thank you for the link to Winograd's insightful comments.

I hope that the HSUS's policy ends up meaning something for victimized pit bulls. Winograd's assessment shows why we shouldn't hope too much.

Posted by h h on 04/13/2009 @ 07:34PM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by h
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

Comment

Check Spelling

Email me when there are new posts to this thread
Comment Policy

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Stephanie is an independent animal rights advocate, a vegan, a tree-hugging environmentalist, and a freelance editor and writer. She lives in St. Louis with an aging corgi-lab and an adolescent rescued pit bull.