Animal Rights

Affluent Kids Get Healthy Animal-Free Lunches; Why Not All Children?

Published August 11, 2009 @ 08:36AM PT

We've talked about the need for healthy, humane plant-based options in schools several times on this blog (e.g., here and here). PCRM's Healthy School Lunches campaign has had a related petition on this site for a while now, in addition to elsewhere on the Web (go sign if you haven't!).

And recently, with the reauthorization of the Child Nutrition Act coming up in October, PCRM has stepped up its campaign, with this compelling ad placed around D.C., an ad that some find bothersome, as the Washington Post is reporting today.

The complaints of some? That this uses or goes after the president's kids, a strategy considered off-limits. But I'm with PCRM on this one. The girls aren't named. Their photos aren't used. But the fact that kids from affluent families have access to the kinds of healthy foods that less privileged kids don't is an important point that needs to be made:

Barnard says he doesn't see anything compromising or controversial about the poster, which features Jasmine Messiah standing impishly, arms crossed, in a red dress against a red background, with a clip-art-style thought bubble aligned with her left pigtail. For Barnard, juxtaposing Jasmine with Sasha and Malia was particularly important.

"The direct comparison is: You have affluent children with access to healthy foods, and disadvantaged children have the same rights to the same kinds of healthy meals as affluent kids. And we are fighting for that fairness, so we felt that making that statement as directly as we could was important."

Barnard says the majority of schools in the National School Lunch Program (which includes more than 94,000 public schools) do not offer vegetarian or vegan options, despite the fact that the American Medical Association passed a unanimous resolution in 2007 recommending that these options be made available.

I do think campaigns such as this have to be made personal. People need to see and hear from and about real kids' experiences--and about the unjustifiable discrepancies between those experiences. This isn't an abstract conversation featuring hypotheticals--it's about real kids in schools across the nation who are fed unhealthy junk every day, without even the opportunity to choose something healthier and more ethical.

So if pointing out that the children of well-off politicians have the healthy options that less advantaged kids don't--and that the government has the power and responsibility to change that--is what it takes, I'm all for it.

And in case you're wondering about the adorable young girl (a vegetarian herself) in the poster, here's the story of how her image came to be used:

As for the (literal) poster-child, Jasmine came to PCRM's attention this spring when she traveled to the District with her mother, Sarah Messiah, an epidemiologist at the University of Miami who spoke before the House and Senate on childhood obesity as part of a conference organized by PCRM. Barnard recalls that Jasmine had recently studied government in school and that she was eager to see theory in practice.

At one of these hearings, Barnard says, the 8-year-old approached the mike. "She said: 'I have something I want to say. . . . In my school, there isn't anything I can eat. There isn't anything healthy at all.' "

Barnard, inspired, got an on-hand photographer to take Jasmine's picture -- now the main image in the Metro posters.

For both health reasons and ethical reasons--there absolutely are compassionate kids who don't want to eat animals, but whose school cafeterias don't provide them with healthy alternatives (and, unfortunately, whose parents may not be supportive of their choices either, in many cases)--it is beyond time that changes be made. We're not talking about turning all school lunch programs vegan (though, naturally, I'd consider that a marvelous idea); all we're talking about is giving kids healthy vegan options. And there isn't a single good reason not to.

Learn more about the campaign here.

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (3)

  1. Michelle Taylor

    Thanks so much for writing about this Stephanie, I completely agree with your responses to th Wash Post article!

    Posted by Michelle Taylor on 08/11/2009 @ 10:04AM PT

  2. Reply to thread
  3. Jen Ruff

    It would be so nice to see PCRM posters in the DC metro instead of the anti-PETA CCF posters that used to dominate. 

    As someone who grew up going to an elementary school where we were not permitted to bring our own lunches (Kosher only), it only now strikes me as so lucky that I was always provided with vegetarian food. I was, at one point, the only vegetarian in the school. It was a small, private school and I now know how lucky I was that they made sure I was always provided with food. Although I don't have any children myself, I was deeply bothered by my sister's attempts to go vegetarian in elementary school being stymied by a lack of options. Kids deserve to be able to make ethical and healthy meal choices; if their dietary restrictions were religious, you can bet something would be done. 

    Posted by Jen Ruff on 08/11/2009 @ 01:43PM PT

  4. Kelly Garbato

    Agreed. There's a world of difference between appropriating the childrens' names and likenesses to sell a product or push an agenda -- and simply pointing out the facts (in this case, that the president can afford to buy options for his own children which should be available to all, regardless of class and income). PCRM wasn't "going after" Sasha and Malia, as some news report(er)s have stated - rather, it was targeting affluent politicians and policy-makers. (I was pleasantly surprised to see Wolf Blitzer's panel understand and articulate the difference on yesterday's Situation Room - even if Wolf did not.)

    Re: religion & diet - shouldn't schools be forced by law to offer vegetarian/vegan options anyhow, as some people are vegetarian/vegan for religious reasons? Or does this only become an issue when there's an *actual* religious vegetarian/vegan enrolled in the school?

    Not that I think religiously derived morals ought to be held in higher esteem than those of a secular nature...

    Posted by Kelly Garbato on 08/12/2009 @ 08:24PM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author
Stephanie Ernst

Stephanie is an independent animal rights advocate, a vegan, a tree-hugging environmentalist, and a freelance editor and writer. She lives in St. Louis with an aging corgi-lab and an adolescent rescued pit bull.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.